Funds
Significant increases in donor-advised fund (DAF) fundraising and grantmaking reflect the field's ability to "activate" this portion of their donor base in a time of crisis. As many community foundations work to act as partners to their DAF holders, the trust that results from that partnership manifests in an increase of philanthropic activity when it is needed most.
Endowed and non-endowed assets
Smaller, emerging, and growing community foundations that may be focused on asset growth typically have a relatively high proportion of endowed assets. Larger community foundations, with an increased focus on diversifying their portfolios and providing flexible options for donors to engage in philanthropy, are more likely to have a higher proportion of pass-through funds.
Median percentages for the proportion of assets that are endowed and non-endowed may not add up to 100% due to rounding. (n=194)
Product mix
Larger community foundations tend to manage more DAFs and carry more DAF assets than their smaller counterparts, as they seek to grow their donor bases and provide services to those donors to facilitate their participation in locally-focused philanthropy.
Averages were used to total 100 percent. (n=209)
| Size of Foundation | Donor-advised funds | Discretionary funds | All other funds |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0-$25M | 10% | 28% | 62% |
| $25-$50M | 12% | 20% | 69% |
| $50-$100M | 25% | 19% | 56% |
| $100-$250M | 27% | 15% | 59% |
| $250-$500M | 32% | 16% | 52% |
| $500M+ | 36% | 12% | 52% |
| All | 22% | 19% | 59% |
Total donor-advised fund assets, gifts, and grants
Total reported DAF assets grew by five percent over the reported FY18 total, even as fewer community foundations participated in the FY19 survey, reflecting the high rate of growth for assets across the field. (n=236)
| Total | |
|---|---|
| Assets | $32,242,725,086 |
| Gifts | $5,359,935,261 |
| Grants | $4,926,165,072 |
Donor-advised fund flow rate
The "flow rate" of DAFs compares a given year's grantmaking total with its gift total, dividing grants by gifts. This metric may help capture the activity of donors who contribute to their DAF and grant from it that same year. High median DAF flow rates in every asset cohort suggest a high rate of overall grantmaking that keeps pace with fundraising.
More than one-third of FY19 Columbus Survey respondents reported DAF flow rates of over 100%, granting more from their DAFs than those funds brought in as gifts. (n=211)
Distribution rates
DAFs at community foundations tend to be highly active grantmaking vehicles; close to half (48 percent) of all survey respondents reported double-digit distribution rates from their DAFs in FY19. With typically higher proportions of pass-through funds available for granting, larger community foundations tend to report higher distribution rates overall.
Sample size for DAF distribution rates are slightly smaller (n=213) than for the whole foundation (n=234).
| Size of Foundation | Donor-Advised Funds | Whole Foundation |
|---|---|---|
| <$25M | 3% | 4% |
| $25M - $50M | 6% | 3% |
| $50M - $100M | 9% | 5% |
| $100M - $250M | 10% | 7% |
| $250M - $500M | 12% | 8% |
| >$500M | 14% | 9% |
Inactive donor-advised funds policy
More than half of all Columbus Survey respondents reported the existence of a policy in place to address the "dormancy" of DAFs, typically defined by the passage of a predefined period of time after which no grants were awarded from the fund. (n=238)
| | Percentage |
|---|---|
| No response | 24% |
| No policy | 16% |
| Policy exists | 60% |
How many years until a DAF is considered inactive?
Nearly all respondents said that they consider a DAF to be inactive if no grant is made from the fund within five years, with three-quarters considering a DAF to be inactive if it hasn't awarded a grant within three years. Although few in number, there were instances of the community foundation considering a DAF to be dormant after 10 or more years of inactivity, citing the potential for the donor to establish the fund with the intention of building its balance to activate the fund toward more impactful grantmaking in the future. (n=171)
Steps taken to address inactive donor advised funds
More than two-thirds of those respondents who share what steps they take to address "inactive" DAFs said that they, at minimum, notify the DAF holder to activate the fund by recommending a grant, but fewer community foundations take additional action beyond that initial step. When survey respondents were offered the opportunity to share other actions they take to address an inactive DAF, virtually all stated that they execute some combination of the steps listed per the community foundation's fund agreement. Several survey respondents pointed out that they have yet to execute any of these steps, citing a lack of funds that remained inactive beyond the defined time horizon. (n=168)
What's the idea behind the survey?
CF Insights responds to a hunger for shared knowledge among community foundations. Learn more about how this survey helps us do that.
Questions?
